Richard Vanek - Black and White Photography

«  June 2006  »
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 
Archive

Thursday, 15th June, 2006

New photo: shadows Foma 200@100 in Aculux II 1:9
[posted at 05:52 GMT]    

Enough details in the darkest part of the hat. That means exposure was good enough to carry information from dark part of the scene.

New photo: highlights Foma 200@100 in Aculux II 1:9
[posted at 05:52 GMT]    

You can see enough details on the most exposed part of the image. This button of the water pump is still carrying on its middle and left side information about details, while right side which was directly exposed to the sun is just burned. That indicate the development time for this kind of scene and exposure is just right.

New photo: Foma 200@100 in Aculux II 1:9
[posted at 05:52 GMT]    

Developed in Paterson Aculux II diluted 1:9 for 6 minutes at temperature 20C. This is what I consider nicely developed negative. You can immediately see deep blacks on hat and whites on the buttons of the water pump. Difference with shot developed using FD-10 is that here there was more light intensity and that could lead to better highlights.

New photo: shadows of Foma 200@100 in FD10 1:9
[posted at 05:53 GMT]    

I believe separation in shadows is good, you can see (on good monitor and paper) all the details of the Mamiya viewfinder. This means that there was enough exposure for developing information in the dark parts. So exposure is OK. Well that is not a problem I guess when pulling film :-) You can also observe a grain in this 1:1 crop from 5400dpi scan.

New photo: highlights of Foma 200@100 in FD10 1:9
[posted at 05:53 GMT]    

This was only part where histogram shows the most white. Unfortunately you can see the white is not the whites. That is easily seen also from histogram of the scanner. On handle you can see all the details. This would indicate that time of the development was too short to get full whites. This can be also result of not enough light for that exposure, but can be compensated with extended development

New photo: Foma 200@100 in FD10 1:9
[posted at 05:53 GMT]    

Developed in Fotospeed FD10 diluted 1:9 for 6 minutes at temperature 19-19.5C. My feeling also based on following two shots of shadows and highlights is that this will be needed little bit more of development. Probably result of lower temperature.

New experiment: Fomapan 200 exposed at 100
[posted at 05:57 GMT]    

I have added new experiment page where I show you my progress with approaching development of Fomapan 200 exposed at 100 ASA. The reason for this kind of pulling is that I like to get the best image quality with that old type of look while I need at least 100ASA. This approach failed with Fuji Across 100. It worked perfectly with Kodak 125PX, which is great film, but hard to get here and if than very expensive. Therefore I am trying Fomapan 200 creative.